Surface the blind spots
Expose the feeder / origin milestones and full Class I rail events that IMS cannot reach today — visibly, on in-scope containers.
You asked us to test the case for a single, unified Supply Chain Control Tower. This page walks through where the visibility gaps are today, what they cost, and how one layer across ocean, feeder, rail, and depot closes them.
Prepared for Cheryl Welch, Vice President, Supply Chain – Transportation, Lowe’s
Gnosis · August 27, 2026 · Confidential — under mutual NDA since February 2026
That is the number the Control Tower is built to move, and it is grounded in what we have analyzed across Lowe’s data so far and what we deliver for other large shippers today. Everything that follows — the blind spots, the ISF wedge, the demurrage exposure — is a concrete proof point for how we get there.
One unified visibility and execution layer instead of fragmented systems and manual spreadsheets — a single coherent data model for the entire inbound supply chain.
It sits on top of Maersk Supply Chain Platform and Blue Yonder TMS, which handle different functions across different parts of the chain, and unifies what they see while adding the layer they don’t cover.
At the same time it replaces IMS as the DCM and visibility layer, delivering the same function on a modern data model.
This is the direction you have already been moving toward, and the sections that follow lay out the evidence behind it.
A unified Supply Chain Control Tower is a stated Lowe’s initiative, not something we’re introducing. The question was never whether the destination is right — it’s whether a partner can actually deliver it. We have built this layer for other large shippers, and it is running in production today.
Delivered for shippers like
Shared under the mutual NDA in place since February 2026. Named references and reference calls available on request.
You don’t have to buy the whole platform to see the value. Each item below is a discrete, painful problem we can close on its own, on your own data, inside the POC. Individually they pay for themselves; together they are proof points for what a full Control Tower partnership with Gnosis looks like.
Real-time visibility into feeder and transshipment moves, plus the 2–3 day origin gate-in to vessel-departure window that is dark today. Lowe’s flagged this window as P1.
The customs-timing intelligence that mitigates exam and appointment demurrage is the same capability that validates whether ISF filings are on time and correct.
Because that one capability produces value in two different places, it makes the case for a unified platform rather than a set of point solutions — you build the intelligence once and it pays back across both demurrage mitigation and compliance.
Every late or incorrect ISF filing carries a direct penalty, and the timing intelligence needed to prevent it is something Gnosis already produces.
These figures are hypotheses to confirm in the POC rather than guarantees. Soft savings, such as the FTE hours currently spent disputing charges manually, would be additional and are not modeled here.
Gnosis replaces IMS as the DCM and visibility layer, and sits on top of Maersk SCM and Blue Yonder TMS without disturbing them.
The systems Gnosis replaces are used primarily by the logistics and transportation org that you own, which keeps the line of ownership clean from decision through to deployment.
This same layered approach — unifying visibility on top of Maersk and a domestic TMS — is live today with a comparable big-box importer, using the same partners.
Expose the feeder / origin milestones and full Class I rail events that IMS cannot reach today — visibly, on in-scope containers.
Quantify Lowe’s actual demurrage and detention spend and ISF exposure from your own historical container data.
Show what Gnosis’s ~30% capture rate would have saved on real Lowe’s containers last quarter, so the business case is built entirely from your own figures.
Agreed up front so success is unambiguous
Gnosis surfaces feeder / origin and full Class I rail events IMS does not, on 95% of in-scope containers.
95%Predictive ETA accuracy beats current IMS ETA error by 25% (baseline captured at POC start).
25%Measured demurrage / ISF exposure on POC containers reported as actual dollars; annualized addressable savings at the agreed capture rate.
Actual $Feeder milestones, Class I rail, and demurrage and ISF exposure aren’t the product in themselves; they are the proof points. They represent the hardest, most granular corners of your supply chain, the ones IMS can’t reach, and delivering on them sets the standard you can expect across the entire Control Tower.
The POC measures those corners, but what you are ultimately investing in is the complete picture across the whole chain.
Validate the hardest, most granular corners against Lowe’s own data over 60 days.
The unified visibility and execution layer spanning ocean, feeder, rail, and depot in a single view.
FinOps / freight audit, drayage TMS, and ERP integration as the platform expands.